INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 25700 OF 2025
9 Oct 2025...
Search Results for "Bombay High Court original side"
4792 result(s) found
Found 4792 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Insolvency Notice Based on Foreign Judgment — Notice Held Without Jurisdiction as Debt Not Payable Under Indian Insolvency Act. Foreign judgment debt not enforceable under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 without satisfying conditions of Section 13 CPC.
17 Dec 2012The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the Judgment Debtor, Neville Tuli, seeking to set aside an Insolvency Notice No. N/28 of 2011 issued by ...
- 144
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Final Decree Proceedings — Mesne Profits Must Be Determined Before Auction Sale. Held that mesne profits under Section 2(12) CPC are a substantive right that cannot be deferred until after the sale of property in final decree proceedings.
10 Dec 2025The petitioner, Sri S.P. Suresh, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the XV...
- 127
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Hears Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. The Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Denying Interim Protection Despite Registered Device Mark and Alleged Joint Use of the 'Kshetrapal' Mark.
16 Mar 2026The dispute centered on the use of the trademark 'Shree Kshetrapal' / 'Kshetrapal Construction' by two individuals in the construction business in Guj...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Second Appeal Against Setting Aside of Specific Performance Decree—Expedited Hearing Ordered Despite Adjournment Requests. The appeal, admitted on questions of law, was treated as part-heard and oral judgment delivered after refusal to grant further time.
11 Mar 2016The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Nagpur, heard Second Appeal No. 210/2013 arising from a suit for specific performance of an agreement...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Criminal Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Petitioner's right to prosecute respondent for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 revived after respondent failed to deposit amount as directed.
4 May 2006The petitioner, Anil Prabhakar Naik, filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondents for ...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case on Grounds of Reasonable and Bona Fide Requirement, Subletting, Non-User, and Acquisition of Alternate Accommodation. Landlord's requirement for self and sons for business held genuine; tenant's subletting without consent and non-user proved under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.
14 Sep 2017The petitioners, landlords of commercial premises in Solapur, challenged the judgment of the III Additional District Judge, Solapur, which reversed th...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Petitioners in Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Exclusive Rights to Manufacture Ice Cream Under 'Vadilal' Brand in Designated Territories Preserved Pending Arbitration Arising from 1993 Family Settlement.
30 Jun 2026Shailesh R. Gandhi, Bela S. Gandhi, and Vadilal Dairy International Limited (formerly Super Milk Makers Private Limited) filed a petition under Sectio...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.
15 Nov 2017The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. The court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration as the findings of fact by the lower appellate court were based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.
5 Mar 2024The present second appeal arises from a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) claiming ownership and exclu...
- 62
