KAHC010400602018_1
4 Sep 2024The appeals arose from the conviction of accused No.1, Smt. Uma, and accused No.2, Sri. Shivabasavegowda, by the trial court for offences under Sectio...
Search Results for "window period"
591 result(s) found
Found 591 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.
20 Aug 2015The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Deprecates Malegaon Municipal Corporation for Dereliction of Duty in Removing Unauthorized Constructions. Purchase Notice under Section 127 MRTP Act Not Adjudicated Due to Pending Inter Se Disputes.
4 Nov 2025The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition filed by ten individuals claiming ownership of plot bearing survey number 110/B in Malega...
- 136
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Originating Summons Regarding Interpretation of Will and Executor’s Discretion. Questions Raised Include Validity of Purchase of Bungalow Instead of Flat and Nature of Bequeath to Plaintiff and Granddaughter Under Clauses 15, 6, 7, etc.
19 Jan 2005The present originating summons arose from disputes concerning the last will and testament of Mrs. Pillo M. Ghaswala, who died on 7 October 1989. The ...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes Public Interest Litigation and Writ Petition on STFR Meter Technology. Court Considers Enquiry into Missing Soil Parameters and Restraint on Marketing Without Multi-Zonal Validation.
3 Jan 2020The matter comprised Public Interest Litigation No. 115 of 2017 filed by Anand Embadwar and Writ Petition No. 5845 of 2018 filed by Nagarjuna Agro Che...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Maintainability of Gratuity Application Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Dispute Over Quantum of Contractual Gratuity Under Section 4(5) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Falls Within Jurisdiction of Controlling Authority Under Section 7.
8 Aug 2024The petitioner-employer, Vitesco Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the order of the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act-cum-I...
- 470
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Overruled Precedent and Lack of Title. High Court's Declaration of Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Quashed as Possession Was Taken and Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent Overruled.
13 Jan 2023The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi, which had allowed a writ petition and declared that land acquisition was deemed to have l...
- 238
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi and Erroneous Lapse Declaration. Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Precluding Lapse.
16 Jan 2023The dispute arose from a land acquisition initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with a notification dated 17.06.2005 and declaration under S...
- 222
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Overruling of Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.
16 Jan 2023The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisit...
- 157
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchaser. High Court's Order Declaring Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Set Aside as Subsequent Purchaser Has No Right to Challenge.
20 Jan 2023The dispute arose from a land acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning certain land. The Delhi Development Au...
- 214
