WRIT PETITION NO. 1723 OF 2020
18 Aug 2021The dispute arose from a tender floated by respondent no.1 MIHAN India Ltd. for up-gradation, modernization, operation and management of Dr. Babasaheb...
Search Results for "tenders"
1213 result(s) found
Found 1213 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Bid in Mining Lease e-Auction, Orders Fresh Auction and Penalty. Supreme Court finds error in 140.10% bid to be a genuine mistake, mandates a fresh e-auction while imposing a Rs 3 crore penalty on appellant for lack of due care.
15 Jul 2024Granted leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Orissa, which dismissed the writ petition of the appellant who had mistakenly placed...
- 687
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Lease Rent Revision Based on Ready Reckoner Rates for Housing Societies in Bandra. Court holds that linkage of lease rent to land value is not per se prohibited and the Government Resolutions of 2006, 2012, and 2018 are constitutionally valid.
10 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, upheld the constitutional validity of Government Resolutions (GRs) dated 29th May 2006, 12th Dece...
- 962
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision: BOT Scheme Agreements Classified as Leases, Rejects Claims of Legitimate Expectation and Promissory Estoppel. In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court affirms that Build, Operate & Transfer (BOT) agreements for toll collection fall under the definition of a lease, dismissing appeals challenging legislative amendments and executive assurances.
19 Jul 2024Petitions decided by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, questioning whether a Build, Operate & Transfer (BOT) Scheme agreement, where the right to ...
- 595
High Court
High Court Upholds Rent Control Act, Denying Britannia’s Claim for Market Rent
8 Aug 2024The fixation of standard rent for an upscale apartment in Mumbai, which was rented to Maya Sunil Alagh, the wife of Britannia's former Managing Direct...
- 440
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against Patanjali Ayurved and Its Managing Director for Violating Undertaking Given to Court Regarding Misleading Advertisements and Disparaging Statements Against Modern Medicine. The Court Found Prima Facie Violation of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act, 1954 and the Undertaking Recorded on 21st November, 2023.
13 Aug 2024The Supreme Court of India initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Patanjali Ayurved Limited, its Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna, and Ba...
- 1180
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.
20 Aug 2024The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...
- 362
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Notice Not Validly Served Under Section 15(2) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Appellate Bench's decree set aside for failure to consider jurisdictional issue of service of demand notice.
26 Aug 2024The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the defendant-tenant, Ms. Gloria Lois Crasto, challenging the judgment and decree dated 2 M...
- 273
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification in Tender Process for Canal Restoration Work. Petitioner Disqualified for Non-Compliance with Essential Conditions of Digital Signature and IP Address Submission.
6 Sep 2024The petitioner, M/s. Surendra Infrastructure (P) Ltd., challenged its disqualification in the technical evaluation of an e-tender for restoration of c...
- 488
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Tenant's Deposit of Arrears Within 90 Days of Suit Summons Held Sufficient Under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court found that the trial court's finding that the application for deposit was filed on 10 October 2005 was perverse, as it was actually filed on 3 May 2005, and the deposit made on the next working day after a holiday was valid.
30 Aug 2024The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 26 Fe...
- 237
