Search Results for "substantially same issues"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "substantially same issues"

1733 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1733 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Civil Procedure Amendment Case Regarding Mortgage Redemption Suit. The court upheld the lower courts' orders allowing amendment of plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, holding that issues of limitation and res judicata should be decided at trial, not at the amendment stage.

14 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from a property in Ballia, where the plaintiffs claimed ownership of a shop and filed Suit No. 154 of 2009 for possession upon ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admitted Second Appeal on Questions of Law Concerning Insolvency Act and Auction Sale Confirmation. The Court Framed Eight Substantial Questions Involving Interpretation of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, and Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings.

10 Jun 2013

The matter concerned a long-standing insolvency dispute dating back to 1959. Roopsingh Chainsingh Ture filed Insolvency Application No.12 of 1959 befo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute Over Sale Deed Validity — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court Held That No Substantial Question of Law Arises When Findings Are Based on Appreciation of Evidence and Are Not Perverse.

5 May 2014

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute. The appellants, Rambhau Maroti Fating and others, and M/s L.G. Developers & Buil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Common Cross-Examination in Eviction Suits to Prevent Prejudice to Tenants. Trial Court's Order Dismissing Application for Common Cross-Examination Set Aside Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

29 Aug 2019

The petitioners, tenants in four eviction suits filed by the respondent landlord society, sought common cross-examination of the society's sole witnes...

High Court

Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment in Writ Petition Lodging No. 3069 of 2018 Regarding Withdrawal of Electric Bus Contract. Dispute Involved Whether BEST Could Withdraw Contract Work Order Based on Note that Acceptance Was Subject to DHI Incentive Approval.

16 Oct 2018

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Olectra Greentec Limited (formerly Goldstone Infratech Limited) ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

20 Aug 2015

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Dismissed Employee in Service Law Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Prejudice from Criminal Acquittal. Departmental Proceedings Were Quashed as Denial of Cross-Examination and Identical Charges Post-Acquittal Rendered the Dismissal Order Legally Unsustainable Under Principles of Natural Justice and Administrative Law.

23 Apr 2025

The dispute involved a constable in the Crime Investigation Department (CID) who was dismissed from service following departmental proceedings initiat...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging MBBS Seat Allotment Based on NEET Scores — No Right to Claim Admission Beyond Published Merit List. Petitioners, who were not in the merit list, had no vested right to challenge allotment to other candidates.

23 Sep 2019

The petitioners, Kum. Pujal V. Nayak and Kum. Annabelle Melanie Gomes, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the al...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Act Section 80-IB(10) Cases – Clause (d) Commercial Area Limit Not Applicable to Projects Approved Before 31 March 2005. Housing Projects Approved Pre-2005 Held Entitled to Deduction Under Section 80-IB(10) Even if Commercial Area Exceeds 5% or 2000 Sq Ft, Per Ratio in CIT v. Brahma Associates.

19 Sep 2014

These two income tax appeals were filed by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appell...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India Examines Constitutional Validity of Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision Order for Bihar. Petitions Filed Under Article 32 of Constitution of India Allege Potential Disenfranchisement and Arbitrariness in Voter Roll Purge Contrary to Universal Adult Suffrage Guarantee.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging the Election Commission of India's O...

38 39 40 41 42

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)