Search Results for "single transaction rule"

1678 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1678 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears and Decides Batch of Appeals Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Regarding Compensation for Kakhandaki Village Lands. The Court Examined Market Value Determinations Made by the Reference Court Under Sections 18 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Background: A batch of appeals and cross objections were filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 189...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Challenging Compensation Awards in Land Acquisition Matters. The Court Determined Market Value of Lands Acquired for a Minor Irrigation Tank in Kakhandaki Village, Bijapur District.

In the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Sessions Court's Revision Order Against Issuance of Process. Order of Issuance of Process Under Section 204 CrPC is Interlocutory and Not Revisable Under Section 397(2) CrPC.

The petitioner, Sharad Vasant Sawant, filed a complaint under Sections 406 and 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against respondent nos....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Limitation and Acknowledgment of Debt. Defendant's Application for Leave to Defend Allowed Subject to Deposit of 50% of Suit Amount Under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of CPC, 1908.

The plaintiffs, Carl Pinto De Andrade and others, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Ventura Securities Limited for recovery of Rs. 1,00,00,000/-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Amalgamation of Five Transferor Companies with Unichem Laboratories Limited. Scheme held fair and reasonable under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956, despite shareholder objection.

The judgment concerns five Company Scheme Petitions filed under Sections 391 to 394 read with Sections 80, 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Bank Fraud Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Offences Allegedly Committed in Dubai Cannot Be Tried in Ahmednagar Without Sanction Under Section 188 CrPC.

The petitioners, Kishore Devji Sagar and Pravinchandra Devji Sagar, were original accused in RTC No. 165 of 2003 pending before the Chief Judicial Mag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Expeditious Disposal of Execution Case and Restoration of Conviction — Execution Case Already Disposed, Conviction Set Aside on Appeal. No Mandamus Issued as Relief Sought Became Infructuous.

The petitioner, Mr. Hemachandra M. Kuppalli, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Admission of Winding-Up Petitions Under Companies Act, 1956 — Held That Company Court Has Discretion to Appoint Provisional Liquidator and That Appeal Against Admission Order Is Not Maintainable Under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of appeals filed by Vision Millennium Exports Pvt. Ltd. against orders of the Company Court admitting winding-up petitio...