Search Results for "senior advocate designation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "senior advocate designation"

411 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 411 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Seeking Quashing of Notification Declaring Malegaon (Budruk) as Transitional Area for Nagar Panchayat. The petition raises issues regarding compliance with Section 341A of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 and the criteria for transitional area designation.

16 Mar 2022

The petitioner, a resident of Malegaon (Budruk), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Government of Maharashtra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute, Holds Ahmedabad Courts Competent for Section 34 Petition. Mutual Consent to Shift Venue to Ahmedabad Established Seat There, Granting Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Overriding Original Clause Designating Rajasthan Courts.

13 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute over jurisdiction for a Section 34 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The appellant, Inox Rene...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Furlough Rule Denying Furlough to Prisoners from Outside Maharashtra. Classification Based on Residence Held Reasonable Under Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution.

20 Oct 2020

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Furlough Condition in Maharashtra Prisons Rules as Unconstitutional. Residence-based classification for furlough eligibility violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

20 Oct 2020

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Illegal Sand Mining Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under MMDR Act. Petitioner/Accused No.1 Charged Under Section 379 IPC and Sections 21, 22 of MMDR Act for Alleged Theft of Sand – Proceedings Quashed as Cognizance Without Required Sanction Under Section 22 of MMDR Act is Invalid.

16 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri Rudrappa, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals Against Dismissal of Writ Petitions on Ground of Delay and Laches. Appellant's Challenge to Appointment Conditions and Subsequent Appointment of Director General Rejected.

26 Apr 2019

The appellant, who had been appointed as Director General of Central Power Research Institute (CPRI) by direct recruitment, challenged the terms of hi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds 10% Deposit Condition in Arbitration Clause as Valid in Commercial Contracts. Clause requiring deposit-at-call of 10% of claim amount before invoking arbitration is not arbitrary or discriminatory under Article 14.

11 Mar 2019

The case arose from a tender issued in 2008 by the Punjab State Water Supply & Sewerage Board for water supply and sewerage projects. The appellant, M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Show-Cause Notice Under Customs Act — No Interference at Pre-Adjudication Stage. Section 28(11) of Customs Act, 1962 Upheld as Valid and Compensatory in Nature.

30 Jan 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Royaloak Furniture India LLP, a furniture importer, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions of Retired Employees Against Denial of Annual Increment. Employees who retired during the increment year are entitled to one annual increment for the service rendered in the preceding year under Rule 10 of the Karnataka Electricity Board Employees' Service Regulations, 1997.

24 Apr 2017

The petitioners, five retired employees of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), Bangalore Electricity Supply Company (BESCOM), an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeals in Industrial Dispute Cases — Workmen Entitled to Reinstatement with Back Wages as Retrenchment Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Was Illegal. The court upheld the Labour Court's finding that retrenchment of workmen who had completed 240 days of service was void for non-compliance with Section 25-F, and reinstatement with full back wages was justified.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Godrej Industries Ltd. (formerly Godrej Soaps Ltd.), employed the respondents as workmen. The respondents were retrenched by the appell...

38 39 40 41 42

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)