Search Results for "road repair"

551 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 551 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition Against Tenant Not Party to Arbitration Agreement. Interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be granted against a third party who is not bound by the arbitration agreement.

The petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking int...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case Due to Lack of Identification and Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 396 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove appellant's involvement beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Arjun Ganpat Sandbhor, was convicted by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge-1, Malegaon, for offences under Section 363 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Decree Holders' Challenge to Executing Court's Order Permitting Objector to Lead Evidence in Execution Proceedings. Executing Court Has Discretion to Allow Oral Evidence Under Order 21 Rule 105 CPC When Objector Raises Substantial Questions Regarding Executability of Decree.

The petitioners, decree holders, filed two writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Court of Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Foreign Vessel in Admiralty Suit — Plaintiffs' Claim for Supply of Bunkers and Stores Falls Within Admiralty Jurisdiction Under Section 4(1) of the Admiralty Act, 2017.

The plaintiffs, Universal Marine and Ramanand Padiyar, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M.T. Hartati (a Singapore-flagged vessel) and its ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Namdev Mahadev Dhumal, Anil Namdev Dhumal, and Sunil Namdev Dhumal, were convicted by the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge at Palg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Due to Lack of Fraud Pleadings and Limitation Bar. Suit challenging registered sale deed after 14 years dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove fraud and suit was barred by limitation under Article 59 of Limitation Act.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit filed by the plaintiff (respondent no.1) seeking a declaration that a registered sale deed dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition Order Set Aside as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing, Despite Alleged Unauthorized Construction in Heritage Precinct.

The petitioners, Raul Aires Fernandes and John Aires Fernandes, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 30 March 2016 issued by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against BESCOM Engineers in Negligence Case — Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Rash or Negligent Act. Section 304A IPC requires proof of gross negligence directly causing death, not mere failure of duty.

The petitioners, Sri Sreeramu V. and Subramanya T., who are Executive Engineer and Assistant Executive Engineer respectively at BESCOM's Whitefield Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cheque Dishonour Proceedings Against Partners Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails to satisfy requirements of Section 141 of the Act for imputing liability on partners.

The petitioners, accused No.1 (M/s. Conserve Ready Mix Concrete, a partnership firm) and accused No.2 and 3 (partners of the firm), filed a petition u...