Search Results for "representative character"

861 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 861 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Cases Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai Held to Have No Jurisdiction Over Employees Working Outside Mumbai Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, M/s. Abbott Healthcare Private Limited and others, filed three writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Industrial C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Allowing Union to Lead Evidence in Recognition Dispute. The Court held that the Industrial Court has discretion to permit additional evidence at any stage to effectuate the purpose of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a recognized trade union of employees of Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Pune,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Additional Written Statement in Specific Performance Suit. Court upholds trial court's discretion to reject application filed after 22 years as causing prejudice and delay.

The petitioners, original defendants in Special Civil Suit No.347 of 1991, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 13/06/2013 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Probate in Testamentary Matter — No Caveat Filed, No Caveatable Interest Shown. Court holds that a person who has not filed a caveat and has no caveatable interest cannot seek revocation of probate under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case pertains to a petition for revocation of probate filed by Radhika Bhargava and others (petitioners) against Arjun Sahgal and others (responde...