Search Results for "parcel"

1293 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1293 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Judgment Upholding Sanction of Competing Slum Scheme; Appeal Ongoing.

The dispute centered on a 2,005 sq. mts. parcel in Malad, Mumbai, originally declared a slum in 1987 under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal Against Rejection of Bail in POTA Serial Bomb Blasts Case. The Court Examines the Interpretation of Section 49(6) and (7) POTA and Applicability of Bail Restrictions After One Year of Detention.

The appeal arose from the rejection of bail by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA) in connection with three serial bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 20304 OF 2019

The petitioners, engineering graduates from universities other than the University of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Orders under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Applicability of Repeal Act, 1999. Petition Seeks Quashing of Settlement, Notification, and Possession Orders Based on Erroneous Computation of Excess Land and Abatement of Proceedings.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...