Search Results for "interlocutory order challenge"

1151 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1151 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitrator’s Interim Order in Film Remake Rights Case. Dispute Involves Enforcement of Agreement Dated 24 January 2012 Granting Remake Rights of Film 'Zanjeer' and Payment of Instalments.

The petition was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim order dated 16 July 2012 passed by the l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Order for Restitution of Possession in Temple Property Dispute. Section 144 CPC Not Attracted as Possession Was Under Interim Order, Not Decree; Court Has Inherent Power to Restore Status Quo Ante.

The appeal arose from a long-standing property dispute concerning temples and shops in Jaipur. The original plaintiff, Bansidhar Sharma (since decease...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction in Land Allotment Dispute Involving Cooperative Housing Society. Notice of Motion Seeks to Restrain Creation of Third Party Rights Over ~23 Acres Prime Land in Versova, Mumbai.

The judgment text provided only includes the introductory paragraphs outlining the nature of the dispute and the relief sought, without the court's an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Specific Performance Suit — Appellants Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Despite Service of Summons.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of a contract filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the appellants/defendants. The trial cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Consent Order in Company Oppression Case — Parties Bound by Consensus. Consent order for share buyout under Sections 397-398 of Companies Act, 1956 cannot be challenged by consenting party.

The case involves an appeal filed by Shalby Limited and others against an order dated 25.04.2016 passed by the Company Law Board (CLB), New Delhi Benc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...