Search Results for "interest expenses"

4369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Deduction of Contributory Negligence and Proper Application of Multiplier. Claimants' Cross Objection Dismissed as No Evidence of Negligence of Other Vehicle.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a deceased bachelor who died in a vehicular accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Enhances Compensation for Deceased Homemaker. Notional Income of Rs. 5,000 per Month Upheld but Future Prospects and Enhanced Consortium Granted Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves a motor accident claim petition filed by the appellants (claimants) being the husband and children of the deceased Jayaben Himatbhai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Sugar Factories and Distilleries Against State of Maharashtra Regarding Excise Transport Fees. Petitioners Challenged Validity of Transport Fee Demands Under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

The Bombay High Court, in exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a batch of fifty-one writ petitions filed by various sugar factori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Repudiation of Overseas Mediclaim Policy for Non-Disclosure of Pre-existing Condition Set Aside. Insurer Failed to Prove That Insured Had Knowledge of Hyperlipidaemia at Time of Proposal.

The appellant, Manmohan Nanda, sought an overseas mediclaim policy from United India Assurance Co. Ltd. to travel to the USA for a family wedding. He ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Case in Hit-and-Run Accident Due to Lack of Evidence and Compromise. Petitioner accused under Sections 279 and 338 IPC discharged as no eyewitness or material to prove rash driving, and victim did not support prosecution.

The petitioner, accused in C.C.No.1058/PS/2016 for offences under Sections 279 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a writ petition under Article 2...