Search Results for "doubtful recovery"

1256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Murder of Minor in POCSO Case — Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory Sufficient. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and the appellant failed to rebut the presumption under Section 29 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Rahul Gajanan Tumbada, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, for the murder and rape of a 12-year-old girl. The victim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convicts in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved — Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 r/w 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Witnesses Turned Hostile and Individual Overt Acts Not Established.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by convicts challenging their conviction in Sessions Case No. 87 of 2014 passed by the Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory, extra-judicial confession, and recovery beyond reasonable doubt.

The Appellant, Asif Nasir Khan, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Pappu @ Prakash Pardeshi and sentenced to l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Doubtful Evidence. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Salimoddin Gulam Dastagir Shaikh and Gulam Dastagir Bahavoddin Shaikh, were convicted by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Dacoity with Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Articles. Conviction Under Sections 396, 457, and 380 IPC Confirmed as Recovery of Stolen Ornaments Soon After Incident Establishes Guilt.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by appellants Noora, Gorakh, and Navnath against their conviction and sentence by the Additional Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction Under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC Set Aside. The court held that the evidence of interested witnesses, without independent corroboration, is insufficient to sustain a conviction for murder.

The appellants, C.Krishnamoorthy and A.Raj, were convicted under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment by the XVI Additional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two connected criminal appeals arising from Sessions Case No.66 of 2010. The appellants, Iqbal and Arif, were convicted by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two connected criminal appeals arising from a single incident. Criminal Appeal No.876 of 2013 was filed by the accused (Iqbal...