Search Results for "discretionary interest"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "discretionary interest"

2061 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2061 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Chamber Summons to Strike Out Affidavit of Evidence in Specific Performance Suit — Affidavit of Evidence Not a Pleading Under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC. Court Holds That Averments Not in Written Statement May Be Allowed If They Do Not Introduce a New Case or Cause Prejudice.

20 Mar 2013

The Plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of a contract based on an unsigned MOU. The Defendant filed a written statement after a delay of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Patent in Annuity Payment Dispute — Petitioner's Failure to Pay Annuities Due to Bona Fide Mistake and Lack of Proper Communication from Patent Office. Court held that the Patent Office must give notice before treating a patent as ceased and that the petitioner's application for restoration should be considered on merits under Section 60 of the Patents Act, 1970.

10 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Teijin Limited, a Japanese corporation, was the grantee of Patent No. 207883 in India. The patent was granted on 24th October 2003. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice Under M.R.T.P. Act — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction as Structure Appears Temporary and Unauthorized.

1 Feb 2016

The appellant, Mohd. Ismail Gulam Shaikh, filed an appeal against an order of the trial court refusing ad-interim relief in a suit seeking injunction ...

Supreme Court

Article 227 Cannot Override Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Supreme Court Restores Plaint Wrongly Struck Off by High Court (2026 INSC 121)

3 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in striking off the plaint under Article 227 of the Constitution when a specific remedy under Order V...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Injunction Applications Without Considering Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC — Court Held That Plaintiff's Possession and Title Must Be Protected Pending Suit.

19 Jan 2024

The appellant, Smt. Jagadishwari, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for declaration and injunction dismissed as plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession over suit property.

29 Feb 2024

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 20.02.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the legal heirs of Madhavrao Ramchandra More (appellants in SA/66/2003 an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Recall of Witness Under Section 311 CrPC in NI Act Case — Demand Promissory Note and Receipt Essential for Just Decision. The court held that the Magistrate erred in dismissing the application for recall of PW-1 to produce a demand promissory note and receipt, as these documents were essential for the just decision of the case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

13 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Sri Chandrakanth, filed a private complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) against the respondent, S...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Recall of PW-1 Under Section 311 CrPC in NI Act Case — Demand Promissory Note and Receipt Essential for Just Decision. The court held that the trial court erred in dismissing the application for recall solely on the ground of belated production without considering the relevance of the documents to prove the legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

13 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Sri Chandrakanth, filed a private complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) against the respondent, S...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Appeal Against Order Quashing Acceptance of Resignation of Gram Panchayat President. Single Judge Set Aside Resignation Acceptance Holding That Ten Days' Clear Notice Was Not Given Under Section 48 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

24 Apr 2020

The appeal arises from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, a former Adhyaksha of Yalagod Gram Panchayat, who had resigned on 8 March 2019 u...

38 39 40 41 42

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)