Search Results for "discharge application pending"

3557 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3557 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Deliberates on Applicability of Limitation Act to Appeals Before Collector Under Section 137 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Issue Centered on Whether Collector is a 'Court' for the Purpose of Section 29(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.

The writ petition arose from a demand notice dated 23 June 2003 issued to the petitioner, proprietress of Vishal Liquors, an ex-CLII licensee, for an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2025

The appellant, a partnership firm, filed a commercial suit for recovery of its claim amount after attempting pre-institution mediation. The appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Court in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. The petition challenged the order directing reinstatement and backwages on grounds of lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice.

The writ petition challenged the order dated 28/02/2025 passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra at Jalna in Complaint ULP No. 225/2019. The Indust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Partnership Retirement Dispute. The Court Examines Whether the Arbitrator Erred in Rejecting Petitioners' Claims and Imposing Costs Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Background: The dispute arose out of a partnership firm, M/s. Prospective Traders, constituted in 1977 by three family trusts. In 1985, the petitioner...