Search Results for "defence under Section 313 CrPC"

407 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 407 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, M.Raja, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Vellore District, for the murder of Rajesh under Section 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder by Burning Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Dying declaration recorded by Executive Magistrate found unreliable as it contradicted earlier complaint and medical evidence, leading to benefit of doubt to accused.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the judgment of acquittal dated 31.03.2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast-Track Court, Ja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Abduction and Murder Case Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Circumstantial Evidence — High Court's Reversal of Acquittal for Two Accused Upheld Due to Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC.

The case pertains to the abduction and murder of Neelam on 30.08.1985. The informant, Ramanand Singh (PW18), lodged an FIR alleging that seven accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Child Witness. The court held that the sole testimony of a child witness, without corroboration and with material contradictions, was insufficient to convict the accused for murder under Section 302 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Vishnu Dagadu Gaikwad and Balu Vishnu Gaikwad (respondents) for the murder of Ramabai, the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Intent to Humiliate and Absence of Public View. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Intent to Humiliate Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five respondents (original accused) by the 1st Adhoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Baramati, fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Conviction for Employing Child Labour in Tailor Shop. Conviction under Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961 for employing two children below 14 years as helpers upheld.

The petitioner, Sri A M Samiulla, owned a tailor shop named 'Gents Select Tailors' in Gandhinagar, Bangalore. On 27 January 2006, the Senior Labour In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Confirmed as Chain of Circumstances Complete and False Explanation Considered.

The appellant, Maruti s/o Mahadeo Raut, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife and sentenced to lif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 and Consent Was Voluntary.

The appellant, Parvesh Bagde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Puttaiah @ Mahesh, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304A of t...