Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Ramjan @ Ramu S/o Shaheb @ Shaban Shah, was preventively detained by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, under Section 2(c) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Linking to Public Order — Detenu's Alleged Offences Under Indian Penal Code Do Not Justify Detention Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Prakash @ Jado Manharbhai Nayak, through his mother Nayak Minaben Punambhai, challenged a preventive detention order dated 03.04.2025 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Sumit @ Bali Vikrambhai Chunara, through his uncle Anil Dipakbhai Chunara, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicts in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC. High Court's affirmation of life imprisonment upheld based on eyewitness testimony and discovery of weapons, despite challenges to evidence reliability.

The appeal arose from a murder conviction where two appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's custody and bail status, vitiating the preventive detention order.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Firoz @ Babali Makbul Khan, challenged the detention order dated 6th September 2022 passed by the Commissioner of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay of 5 Months. Failure to Comply with Section 3(3) Requirement of Forthwith Approval and Delay in Considering Representation Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Sachin Parshuram Mane, challenged an order of detention dated 30.06.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Detenu's Custody Status. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority did not record satisfaction that detenu was likely to be released on bail.

The petitioner, Mujammil @ Murgya Sabbir Mokashi, challenged an order of detention dated 26.09.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act — Activities Relate to Law and Order, Not Public Order. Personal Dispute Between Co-Residents Does Not Affect Public Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, mother of the detenu Asif Abdul Ahad Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 30 July 2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention o...