Search Results for "commercial tax officer"

1300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision on Deduction of Cumulative Preference Dividends in Section 104 Case. Only Previous Year's Dividend Deductible in Computing Undistributed Income Liable to Additional Income-tax.

The case involves a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue, arising from an order of the Income-ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid When Based on Same Material Considered in Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Shivam Ispat Private Limited, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2016-2017 declaring total income of Rs.32,58,510/-. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Adverse Inference and Denial of Cross-Examination in Commercial Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as No Perversity or Arbitrariness Shown Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sivagami N., was the first defendant in a commercial suit (Com.OS 64/2022) pending before the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices and Orders Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Valid Sanction and Non-Application of Mind. Reassessment proceedings initiated without proper approval under Section 151(2) and based on borrowed satisfaction are invalid.

The petitioner, Ashok Commercial Enterprises, filed nine writ petitions challenging reassessment notices dated 19th July 2021 and 14th July 2021 issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Classification of Stainless Steel Water Filter as Utensil Under Bombay Sales Tax Act. Water Filter Held to Be a Utensil Covered by Schedule Entry C-II-46, Not a General Item.

The case involved two references under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1958, at the instance of the Revenue. The respondent, M/s Neelam App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Film Production Expenditure Disallowance Case. Expenditure on Positive Prints and Advertisement for Film 'KAAL' Held Allowable Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Rule 9A Does Not Exclude General Deduction Provision.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) relating to the assessment yea...