Search Results for "civil suit challenging arbitration"

656 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 656 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contract by MMRDA. Contractual Dispute with Arbitration Clause Not Amenable to Judicial Review Under Article 226 as Termination Was in Accordance with Contract Terms.

The petitioner, Systra MVA Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company with 70% stake in Systra-SMCIPL Consortium, was appointed as General Consultant by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Commercial Court Order in Arbitration Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator — Holds That Section 11(6) Application Under Arbitration Act Is Not Maintainable Before Commercial Court Without Prior Notice Under Section 21.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12.01.2021 passed by the Commercial Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Television Production Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Reputation. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that claimant failed to prove loss of reputation due to alleged breach of contract.

The petitioners, Star India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute. Charter Party Agreement's Demurrage Clause Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Excepted Perils.

The petitioner, Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute Over Defective Machinery. Claim Barred by Limitation as Arbitration Reference Made Beyond Three Years from Cause of Action Under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Premlaxmi & Co., placed an order with respondent No.1, Ingersoll Rand (India) Limited, for purchase of portable compressors. Four ...