Search Results for "balance payment"

4913 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4913 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application Due to Pre-existing Dispute and Limitation. Operational Creditor's claim for work done under contract held to be time-barred and disputed, warranting dismissal under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The appeal arises from the dismissal of a Section 9 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by the National Company Law Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Raymond Limited's Appeals in Central Excise Cenvat Credit Dispute. Cenvat Credit of AED (T&TA) on Inputs Can Be Utilized for Payment of BED on Final Products.

The appellant, Raymond Limited, is a company manufacturing blankets from woollen fibres. The blankets attract only Basic Excise Duty (BED) and not Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favor regarding the cancellation of tender acceptance and forfeiture of earnest money.

The appellant, Sunil Mantri Realty Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Arbitrator in WAPCOS Ltd. v. Salma Dam Joint Venture. The court held that the arbitration agreement was novated by a subsequent amendment and that the petitioner lacked authority to invoke arbitration after revocation of power of attorney.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against the Delhi High Court's order appointing a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Allows Writ Petition Against Bank for Withholding Title Deeds After Full Loan Repayment — Section 171 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Does Not Confer Right of General Lien on Banks Over Security Documents Once Loan Is Fully Discharged.

The petitioner, Sunil s/o Ratnakar Gutte, approached the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench by way of a writ petition against Union Bank of India. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and Mother-in-law for Dowry Death and Cruelty. Section 304-B IPC conviction sustained as death occurred within seven years of marriage and cruelty for dowry was proved.

The appellants, Dhanraj (husband) and Kushavati (mother-in-law), were convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 304-B and 498-A of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petition Challenged Interim Measures Granted by Arbitral Tribunal in Terminalling Service Agreement Dispute.

The petitioner, Gujarat Chemical Port Terminal Co. Ltd., constructed port terminal facilities at Dahej, Gujarat, including tanks for handling and expo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Seeks Resolution of Dispute Over Unauthorized Colony in Faridabad Through Arbitration and Committee Formation. The Court directs parties to submit responses on land extent, layout, and development charges to facilitate completion of the project.

The present dispute pertains to the claim of allottees who were not allotted plots on land owned by respondent No.6-Colonizer, Durga Builders Pvt. Ltd...