Search Results for "advocate withdrawal"

1939 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1939 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award in Workmen Termination Dispute. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Between Firm and Workmen Despite Contractor Engagement.

The petitioner, a partner of M/s. Shah & Co., challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal at Mumbai in Reference (IT) No.24 of 2011. The dispute co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn in KIADB Land Acquisition Challenge. Petitioner Sought Withdrawal of Petition Challenging Notifications Under KIADB Act, 1966, and Court Allowed Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

In the High Court of Karnataka, a writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by a landowner challenging acquisiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application Seeking Section 340 CrPC Proceedings in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute for Alleged Fabrication of MHADA Affidavit. Court Finds Affidavit Was Authentic, E-filed Under Administrative Directions, and Served on All Parties, Negating Claim of Fraud on Court.

The case involved two writ petitions challenging a slum rehabilitation scheme on MHADA land in Bandra East, Mumbai. The petitioners claimed to be MHAD...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Criminal Complaint Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 195 CrPC. Private Complaint Not Maintainable for Offences Under Sections 191-192 IPC Committed in Judicial Proceedings.

The case arises from two criminal complaints filed by M/s Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and another against Prasad Vassudev Keni and others under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CIDCO's Forfeiture of EMD in Plot Allotment. Bid Validity Extended by CIDCO, Allotment Letter Issued Within Extended Period, Petitioner Cannot Unilaterally Withdraw.

The petitioners, Infinity Infra and its partner Ajit Achyut Kandpile, filed a writ petition challenging the action of the City and Industrial Developm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Eligibility Communication Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Interpretation of Section 9(c) of DTVSV Act: Pending criminal proceedings without charge-sheet or not relating to tax matters do not bar eligibility.

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of a communication dated 21st October 2020 issued by the...