Search Results for "advance deposit"

1289 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1289 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging SCEA Directive Excluding Retired Employees from Voter List in Salary Earner's Co-operative Bank Elections. Directive Issued Without Authority Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and Bye-laws Permitting Retired Members to Vote Must Be Respected.

The petitioners, Nashik Zilla Sarkari and Parishad Karmachari Sahakari Bank Ltd. (a salary earner's co-operative bank) and some of its retired employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Summary Suit for Recovery of Rs.1 Crore Based on Negotiable Instrument. Triable Issues Raised Regarding Consideration and Liability of Defendants Under Order XXXVII CPC.

The plaintiff, Parag Jyotindra Gandhi, filed a commercial summary suit against the defendants, Jayant Narendra Mehta and Others, to recover a sum of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Application for Enforcement of Scheme in Sanghi Motors (Bombay) Limited. Scheme formulated under Sections 397, 398, 402 of Companies Act, 1956 involves transfer of oxygen undertaking assets and cylinders.

The matter pertains to Company Application No.328 of 1990 arising out of Company Petition No.128 of 1985, filed before the High Court of Judicature at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Judicial Immunity and IBC Proceedings as Abuse of Process. Challenge to Section 3 of Judges (Protection) Act, 1985 and Section 7 of IBC held to be frivolous and not maintainable.

The petitioner, Mrs. Manisha Nimesh Mehta, as promoter and guarantor of M/s. Perfect Infraengineers Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Cou...