Search Results for "additional material"

14296 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14296 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 120B r/w 302 IPC. Conviction Stemmed from Alleged Conspiracy to Murder Inder Bhatija by Accused No.1 and Others.

The appeal arose from the conviction and sentence of accused No.1 Pappu @ Suresh Budharmal Kalani by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Sessions...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Compromise Between Parties. Settlement Reached Under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Leads to Quashing of FIR and Criminal Revision.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused persons (husband and his relatives) against the order of the Sessions Court ref...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa confirmed conviction of Appellant in Sexual Assault Case Under IPC and Goa Children's Act Due to consistent Evidence and Corroboration

The Appellant was convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Sections 341, 354, 375(b), and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Discharge Petition in Cheating and Forgery Case — Lack of Prima Facie Evidence Against Accused No.3. Petitioner Discharged Under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468 IPC as Complainant Failed to Show Dishonest Intent or Fraudulent Misrepresentation.

The petitioner, Jayaprakash M.R., was arrayed as accused No.3 in C.C.No.452/2019 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Belur, Hassan, for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admit Second Appeals Challenging First Appellate Court's Reversal of Money Decree. Substantial Questions of Law Framed on Whether First Appellate Court Properly Considered Trial Court Findings and Whether Its Findings Were Perverse.

The appellants filed a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 74,37,500 against the respondent based on a memorandum of understanding executed on 01.01.2011...