Search Results for "Void transfer"

1899 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1899 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Purchaser Pendente Lite. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Impleadment Proper as Purchaser is Necessary Party to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

The petitioner, Fabrica Da Igreja De Vasco, purchased the suit property from the original defendant No.1 during the pendency of a suit filed by respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Fragmentation Act Case — Preferential Right of Contiguous Land Owner Upheld. Sale of Fragmented Land to Non-Contiguous Purchaser Violates Section 7 of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

The appellant, Vilas Shivmurti Munde, filed a second appeal against the dismissal of his suit for declaration and injunction. The suit sought to decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Arbitration Petitions Challenging Award on Family Settlement MOU — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Interpretation of MOU Clauses but Sets Aside Award on Certain Claims as Beyond Scope of Reference.

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a sole arbitrator's awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Forfeiture for Breach of Grant Condition. Transfer of Granted Land Without Prior Permission Void Under Section 65 of Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The present writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Shamjibhai Laljibhai Koli (Gohil) challenging the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Seller Against Union of India Over Forward Contract Dispute. Contract Held to be a Non-Transferable Specific Delivery Contract under Section 2(f) of Forward Contract (Regulation) Act, 1952, and Thus Not Illegal.

The dispute arose from a contract entered into in September 1960 between appellant Modi & Co. and the respondent Union of India, acting through the Di...