Search Results for "Shipping"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Shipping"

768 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 768 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Revocation of Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act in Arbitration Petition. Court Holds That Cause of Action for Section 9 Petition Arises Where Arbitration Agreement Is Situated, Not Where Interim Relief Is Sought.

1 Feb 2016

The appeal arose from a judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who allowed Chamber Summons No. 905 of 2013 filed by Respondent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Directing Appellate Arbitral Tribunal to Decide Delay Condonation Application in NSE Arbitration Matter. The Division Bench held that the Single Judge exceeded jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the Appellate Tribunal's dismissal of the appeal as time-barred was a decision on merits and not patently illegal.

14 Mar 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Parties Exclusively Agreed to Pune Courts Under Selling Agency Agreement Clause 8. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract Prevents Bombay High Court from Entertaining Section 34 Petition Despite Respondent's Registered Office in Mumbai.

7 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Unitech Texmech Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petitions Challenging Eviction Decree in Suit for Possession Based on Lease Termination. Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld as No Substantial Question of Law Under Section 115 CPC Arises.

16 Jun 2016

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by tenants (M/s Spring Fresh Drinks Pvt. Ltd., M/s Raskunj, and M/s Kale Gas Company) against the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Award Challenge — No Prima Facie Case Made Out for Unconditional Stay Under Section 36(3) of Arbitration Act. The court held that the applicant failed to demonstrate a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss required for stay of an arbitral award under Section 36(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Order XLI Rule 5 CPC.

16 Dec 2016

The applicant, M/s. PFS Shipping (India) Limited, filed a Notice of Motion seeking unconditional stay of an arbitral award dated 30th April 2016, pend...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in GST Exemption Case Due to Non-Compliance with Notification Conditions. Supply of HDPE Drums to Chemical Manufacturer Does Not Qualify for Concessional Rate Under Notification No.41/2017-IT(Rate) as Goods Were Not Moved Directly to Registered Recipient or Warehouse as Required.

11 Mar 2026

The petitioner, a manufacturer of packaging materials including HDPE drums, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befor...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revision by Indian Oil Corporation in Eviction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Tenancy Termination and Ownership Upheld. Lease of Open Land Not Protected Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; Suit Maintainable Without Probate as Will Was Not Required to Be Proved in Eviction Proceedings.

17 Apr 2026

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) against the concurrent judgments of the Small Causes Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Appeals in GST Case Despite Limitation Bar — Deficiency Memo Not Issued. Rule 92 of CGST Rules, 2017 Mandates Issuance of Deficiency Memo and Opportunity of Hearing Before Rejecting Refund Application; Appellate Authority Must Consider Limitation Issue on Merits.

15 Apr 2026

The petitioner, K Line India Pvt. Ltd., a company providing shipping services, filed refund applications for IGST paid on zero-rated supplies to SEZ u...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to GST Notification Extending Time Limit for Show Cause Notice. Notification No. 09/2023 held valid under Section 168A of CGST Act, 2017 as a legislative act not amenable to certiorari.

1 Oct 2024

The petitioner, M/s Sahaj Construction, a registered dealer under the GST laws, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Striking Off Written Statements in Commercial Suit — Time Limit of 120 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

28 Apr 2026

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by defendants in a commercial suit instituted by Tata Steel Ltd. (respondent) for recovery of amount...

38 39 40 41 42

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)