Search Results for "Sections 302/34 IPC"

2676 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2676 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anjalappa and Ashok, were convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in S.C. No.322/2012 for the murder of a person unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Conspiracy Case Under IPC Sections 120B and 302 Read with 34 Due to Insufficient Evidence and Inconsistencies. Appeals Allowed Setting Aside Trial Court Conviction

The High Court of Karnataka allowed criminal appeals filed by five accused persons, acquitting them of charges under Section 120B of IPC for conspirac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 326 IPC for Grievous Hurt with Iron Rod. Acquittal for Murder Attains Finality as State Does Not Appeal.

The appellant, Suresh Prakashbhan Junghare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 383/2014 for an offence punis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The present appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 04.03.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.301 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Bombay High Court, by a common judgment, allowed three criminal appeals filed by Akshay Laxman Pachphule (original accused No. 1), Mayur Vilas Pac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder of Wife by Assault and Acid Attack — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial evidence including medical evidence, motive, and recovery of incriminating articles held sufficient to prove guilt under Section 302 IPC and Section 498-A IPC.

The appellant, Sitaram Dada Sarode, was convicted by the Trial Court for the murder of his wife Sangita by assaulting her with a lid of autoclave and ...