Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976"

415 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 415 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Licensee Dispute — Appellant Held to Be Tenant Under Rent Act Despite License Agreement. License Agreement Deemed a Sham to Circumvent Rent Control Legislation; Appellant Acquired Tenancy Rights Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

20 Oct 2005

The case involves a dispute over Room No. 46 in Gani Attarwala Chawl, Mumbai. The original respondent (plaintiff) claimed he inducted the original app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Resident Welfare Association Against Developer for Non-Payment of Adequate Compensation Under DCR 33(7). MHADA Directed to Determine and Enforce Compensation for Temporary Alternate Accommodation as Per Notarized Agreements.

26 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Kagalwala Building Resident Welfare Association, representing residents of a building being redeveloped by respondent No.4 (Aaraaish D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan Due to Unenforceable Oral Agreement and Lack of Written Contract. Loan advanced for litigation funding held to be a contingent agreement not enforceable under Order 37 CPC as it lacked a written contract and was based on an oral understanding.

26 Feb 2020

The plaintiff, Vishal Kedia, filed a commercial summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Sureshkumar S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Government's Power to Issue Directions to Appellate Authority Under MHADA Act — Directions Issued Under Section 164 of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act Are Binding on Appellate Authority

8 Aug 2006

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by employees of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) challenging disciplinary...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to MHADA's Rejection of Tenant Eligibility Certification and Revised NOC for Redevelopment. The Court upheld the concurrent findings of the authorities that the developer failed to prove the existence of separate tenancies for the rooms in question.

2 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s. S.K. Realty (formerly known as Aum Developer), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Acquired Property Under MHADA Based on Settlement Between Owners, Tenants, and Builder. Court Holds That Once Acquisition Notification Lapses, Property Can Be Redeveloped by Private Parties with Consent of All Stakeholders.

28 Nov 2011

The petitioners, comprising owners (Petitioners 1 & 2), tenants (Petitioners 3 to 10), and a builder (Petitioner 11), filed a writ petition challengin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Modifying Interest Award Due to Claimant's Delay and Unreasonable Rate. Arbitrator's Discretion Under Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Must Be Exercised with Reasons, and Interest Cannot Be Awarded for Periods of Inaction, with Rate Reduced from 18% to 9% and 6%.

30 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from a construction contract awarded in 1971 for building a road link, with completion delayed until 1977. The contractor, afte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Height Restriction on Multi-Storied Parking Lots Under DCR 33(24). State Government's Power to Modify Development Control Regulations Under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966 Upheld — No Vested Right in Unamended Regulation.

19 Nov 2012

The petitioners, claiming ownership of a plot in Tardeo, Mumbai, challenged a decision of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai contained in a l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA's 10-Year Transfer Ban on Rehab Tenements as Unconstitutional and Ultra Vires. Condition in NOC restricting sale/transfer of tenancy rights for ten years from occupation held to be without statutory authority and violative of Article 300A of the Constitution.

7 Jul 2015

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions challenging a condition imposed by the Mumbai Building Repairs & Reconstruction Board (a unit of M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Petition Quashing MHADA Circular Imposing Additional Premium on Redevelopment. Circular dated 17-10-2007 held ultra vires and not applicable retrospectively to societies which had already obtained NOC, IOD, and Commencement Certificate.

26 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Vishva-Villa Cooperative Housing Society Limited, a society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, owned a plot o...

38 39 40 41 42

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)