Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

598 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 598 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery Notice Against Employee. Recovery of Differential Pay After 25 Years Due to Employer's Mistake Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature of Bombay Quashes Industrial Court's Order Granting Backwages in Forgery Case Under MRTU and PULP Act. Forgery Held Not Minor or Technical Misconduct; Employer Entitled to Withdraw Deposited Amount.

The case arose from a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 filed by an empl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Setting Aside Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Employer Failed to Prove Genuine Closure, Retrenchment of 23 Workmen Without Complying with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, M/s. Sanket Food Products Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgments of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which held that the retrenchmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Interim Order of Industrial Court Directing Continuation of Service in Permanency Complaints. Municipal Corporation's Writ Petitions Allowed Because Main Relief of Permanency Prima Facie Not Tenable Under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The case arose from individual complaints filed by employees of the Sangli, Miraj and Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation under Section 30(2) of the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds 60 Years Retirement Age for Workmen Under Model Standing Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Reduction of Retirement Age from 60 to 58 Years Held Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal and Cross Objection against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to Be Represented by Trade Union Office Bearer in Domestic Inquiry — Vice-President of Union Held Entitled to Represent Member Under Section 22(2)(c) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Statutory Right Cannot Be Restricted by Union Constitution.

The petitioner, Dastgir Alam Mulla, a plant-operator employed by Mysore Petrochemicals Limited since 1992, was suspended on 29-11-2004 and a chargeshe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Industrial Court Order Holding No Unfair Labour Practice in Continuing Daily Wage Watchman Without Sanctioned Post. Government Department Not Liable Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 When No Permanent Post Exists; Compensation Paid on Equal Pay Principle.

The dispute arose from a complaint of unfair labour practice filed by a daily wage watchman who worked for the Directorate of Printing and Stationery,...