Search Results for "Land encroachment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Land encroachment"

886 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 886 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Show Cause Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act — Petitioners Directed to Submit Representation Before Competent Authority. Writ petitions against show cause notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 are not maintainable unless issued by incompetent authority; petitioners must exhaust statutory remedy.

2 Apr 2026

The present writ petitions were filed challenging a show cause notice issued under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. The petiti...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice for Encroachment on Water Body. Encroachment Confirmed by Fresh Survey; Court Directs Enforcement Within Twelve Weeks Under Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Rules, 2007.

16 Mar 2026

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed challenging proceedings dated 06.10.2025 issued by the Assistant En...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MMRDA's Petition for Mangrove Removal for Coastal Road Project Subject to Conditions. Court holds that removal of mangroves for a public infrastructure project is permissible under the CRZ Notification, 2011, provided that compensatory mangrove afforestation is carried out and environmental safeguards are complied with.

12 Sep 2025

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) seeking permission to remove mangr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes ASI Notices for Removal of Structures Near Protected Monument Due to Lack of Authority and Prior Existence. Court Holds that Section 19(2) of Ancient Monuments Act Applies Only to Post-Declaration Constructions and Requires Acquisition and Compensation Under Land Acquisition Laws for Pre-Existing Structures.

6 Apr 2021

Two writ petitions were filed by owners of properties abutting Agastyateertha pond in Badami, Karnataka, challenging notices issued by the Archaeologi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NGT Directions on Buffer Zones for Lakes and Rajakaluves in Bangalore — Environmental Protection Prevails Over Development Rights. The Court held that the NGT's directions for buffer zones of 75 meters around lakes and 25-50 meters around Rajakaluves are valid and must be implemented prospectively, rejecting retrospective application.

5 Mar 2019

The case involves multiple appeals under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging orders of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regularisation of Unauthorised Transfer and Resumption of Land Allotted to Charitable Trust Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the State Government cannot regularise a transfer made without prior consent under Section 41 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cannot order resumption of land without following due process and natural justice.

23 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Rashtriya Shikshan Mandal, a public charitable trust established in 1924 for promoting Ayurvedic education, was allotted land admeasur...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Possession of Party Premises; Issues of Maintainability of Representative Suit and Effect of Election Commission Recognition on Property Rights Considered

11 Oct 2013

The dispute concerns premises No.3, Race Course Road, Bangalore, claimed by the Indian National Congress through its Karnataka Pradesh Congress Commit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC fails as no substantial question of law arises from concurrent findings of fact regarding possession and title over suit property.

26 Sep 2013

The appellants, defendants in the original suit, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Property Encroachment Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact regarding identification of suit plot based on sale deed boundaries and Commissioner's report upheld.

15 Jul 2010

The dispute in this Second Appeal arises from a property boundary and encroachment issue between two adjacent plot owners in Rewatkar Layout, Mouza Di...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration of ownership and injunction dismissed as appellants failed to prove title and possession over disputed property.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, which ha...

38 39 40 41 42

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)