Search Results for "Extraordinary Writ Jurisdiction"

1880 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1880 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal under Section 91 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 against Registrar's order permitting delayed evidence affidavit

The Bombay High Court heard an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 against an order of the Registrar of Trade Marks allowing a delaye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Injunction Dispute Over Land Access. High Court sets aside lower courts' orders rejecting temporary injunction, finding that the Plaintiff had established a prima facie case and balance of convenience for restraining Defendants from interfering with its right of way.

The Petitioner, Mondelez India Foods Private Limited (formerly Cadbury India Company Ltd), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging LIC's Reduction in Gratuity Fund Policy Surrender Value. LIC's decision to pay 92.5% of cash accumulation upheld as consistent with policy terms and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, trustees of the Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited Employees’ Gratuity Trust Fund, had taken out a group gratuity policy ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices and Order in Cenvat Credit Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Recovery of Central Excise Duty for Periods 2007-2008 Barred by Limitation as Notices Issued After Unreasonable Delay of Over 13 Years.

The Petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging five show cause notices issued between 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Challenge to MPSC Procedural Rule on Wait-List in Judicial Service Recruitment. Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 Rule 6(3)(b) and Article 234 of the Constitution Examined.

The Bombay High Court Division Bench heard a batch of writ petitions filed by candidates who had applied for the post of Civil Judge Junior Division a...