Search Results for "Bombay Police Act 1951"

671 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 671 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Society Members in Wildlife Act Case — No Prior Sanction Obtained. Proceedings under Sections 9, 39, 44, 49B, 50, 51, 52 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Section 482 CrPC quashed for lack of mandatory sanction under Section 55 of the Act.

The applicants, who were members of Sindhu Education Society, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act, 1981. Detention Order Under Section 3(2) Challenged for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Credible Material.

The petitioner, Manoj @ Sonya S/o Ramdas Ghule, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 14, 19, 21, 22 and 226 of the Constitution of India and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 57(1)(a) of Bombay Police Act, 1951. Petitioner Externed Without Show Cause Notice or Opportunity of Hearing, and Without Evidence of Habitual Offending or Threat to Public Order.

The petitioner, Dattatraya Ramchandra Jadhav, challenged an externment order dated 15th October 2012 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Satara, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 57 of Bombay Police Act, 1951. Externment order set aside as authority failed to link incamera statements to gambling offences under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887.

The petitioner, Shri Mallu Tikaram Varma, challenged an externment order dated 19.10.2016 passed under Section 57(1)(a)(v) of the Bombay Police Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. The Court Held That a 19-Day Gap Between Passing and Service of Detention Order Without Explanation Violates the Detenu's Right to Make a Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Vishnu @ Bablu Vasant Gawali, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Arbitrariness in Towing of Vehicles in Mumbai - Selection of Towing Contractors Must Be Transparent and Non-Arbitrary. The court held that the selection of towing contractors must be transparent and non-arbitrary under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Gaurang Dinesh Damani, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the towing of vehicles in Mumbai ...