Search Results for "Bombay Civil Service Rules"

5243 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5243 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Zilla Parishad in Reinstatement Case — Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Reinstate Teacher Under Section 24 of Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947. Suit Also Barred by Limitation Under Section 280 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves a Second Appeal by the Zilla Parishad, Solapur, against a judgment of the District Court which had confirmed the Civil Court's decre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Premature Retirement Order Set Aside as Review Committee Failed to Consider Entire Service Record and Adverse Remarks Were Not Communicated.

The Petitioner, a District Judge, challenged his compulsory retirement from service on attaining the age of 55 years, by an order dated 12/07/2018. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank and Employees in Loan Dispute — Dispute Held Purely Civil, No Prima Facie Case of Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust. Allegations of Forgery and Use of Forged Documents Also Not Made Out, FIR Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by ICICI Bank Ltd., its employees (Zarin Daruwala, Girish Nayak, Arati Ramakrishnan, Vipul Parmar, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Compensatory Appointment Despite Pending Civil Suit — Pendency of Civil Suit Regarding Title Does Not Bar Consideration of Rehabilitation Claim Under Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957.

The petitioners, Mirabai Namdeo Gaurkar and her son Raju Namdeo Gaurkar, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 05-12-2020 from Weste...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Levy of Fees on Transporters and Traders Under Essential Commodities Act for Maintenance of Public Distribution System. The court held that the levy under Section 3(3)(f) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 is a valid regulatory fee and not a tax.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the levy of fees on transporters and traders under the Maharashtra Es...