Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

1095 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1095 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 34 Petition and Sets Aside Ex Parte Arbitral Award for Lack of Proper Notice. Arbitrator Directed to Give Fresh Notice to All Parties Before Proceeding.

The petitioners, Mrs. Prajakta Mahesh Joshi and Mr. Mahesh Shrikrishna Joshi, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Arbitration Petitions Challenging Award on Family Settlement MOU — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Interpretation of MOU Clauses but Sets Aside Award on Certain Claims as Beyond Scope of Reference.

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a sole arbitrator's awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Jurisdiction in Arbitration Claim Petition. Court holds that Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides a remedy against an arbitral award, not an interlocutory order, and that the petition is premature.

The petitioner, a cooperative housing society, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 14th Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petition Challenged Interim Measures Granted by Arbitral Tribunal in Terminalling Service Agreement Dispute.

The petitioner, Gujarat Chemical Port Terminal Co. Ltd., constructed port terminal facilities at Dahej, Gujarat, including tanks for handling and expo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Section 9 Interim Relief — Prima Facie Finding of Arbitration Agreement Sufficient. Court Rejects Argument That Existence of Arbitration Agreement Must Be Conclusively Determined at Interim Stage Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court on an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and ...