Search Results for "All India Services Act, 1951"

503 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 503 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award in Retrenchment Dispute. Retrenchment of 12 Liftmen Held Illegal as Management Failed to Prove Abandonment of Service and Compliance with Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Welcomgroup Searock, which manages the Searock Hotel in Bandra, Mumbai, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 15th Febr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds SC/ST Reservation in Excise Licenses — CL-7D Rules Valid. Amendment to Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 providing concessional licenses to SC/ST hotel owners is not arbitrary or unconstitutional.

The petitioner, B Govindraj Hegde, Secretary of the Federation of Wine Merchants Association, Karnataka, challenged the vires of the Karnataka Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Decision of Authority Under Payment of Wages Act in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Classification. Bonus Awarded by Industrial Court Not 'Wages' Under Section 2(vi) as It Is Not Remuneration Payable Under Contract of Employment.

The Supreme Court of India considered whether a bonus awarded by the Industrial Court, Bombay, to the operatives of Tata Mills Ltd. constituted 'wages...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Election Petition Challenging Disqualification Under Section 12(h) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 — Petitioner's Interest in Panchayat Work Not Proved

The petitioner, Sri B T Kumar, filed an election petition under the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 challenging the election of resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.323 OF 2000

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various companies, including Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and India...