Search Results for "1922"

511 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 511 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition by Karnataka Lokayukta Challenging KSAT Order Setting Aside Charge Memo. Enquiry Officer's Report Exonerating Employee of Misappropriation Upheld as Petition Withdrawn.

The Karnataka Lokayukta filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Prosecution Against Accused in Customs Act Case for Non-Compliance with Section 138(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Delay in Filing Complaint Not Explained. Complaint Filed Beyond One-Year Limitation Period Without Any Extension or Explanation, Hence Liable to Be Quashed.

The petitioner, Imtiaz Ahmed, was arraigned as Accused No.2 in CC No.210/2014 pending before the Principal Sessions Judge (Special Judge), Dakshina Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Sale Deeds as Inadmissible for Want of Stamp Duty — Held that Documents Executed by Sovereign Ruler Are Exempt from Stamp Duty Under Article 363 of the Constitution and Section 3 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The petitioner, H H Jyotendra Sinhji Vikramsinhji, represented by his power of attorney holder Girish, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Sets Aside MSME Facilitation Council Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — BSNL Not Liable for Interest Under MSMED Act as Council Had No Territorial Authority Over Dispute Arising from Contract with Chennai Seat of Arbitration.

The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Set Aside as Surrender of Income Was to Buy Peace, Not Concealment. Stock Difference Detected During Survey Was Not Deliberately Concealed and Related to Earlier Assessment Year.

The appellant-assessee, a partnership firm running a bar and restaurant, was subjected to a survey under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restitution to Judgment Debtor in Execution Case Despite Decree Modified Only as to Interest. Decree Holder Auction Purchaser Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 144 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for recovery of money. The original plaintiffs (Respondent Nos. 1-3) filed Special Civil Suit No...