Search Results for "wilful disobedience"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "wilful disobedience"

220 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 220 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Violation of Status Quo Order in Arbitration Dispute. Status Quo Order Ambiguous and Not Willfully Disobeyed by Respondents in Sale of Flats Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Jul 2026

The judgment arises from a contempt petition filed by Amkhim Holdings Pvt. Ltd. and Vasant Kotak & Bros. Trading & Investments Pvt. Ltd. against respo...

High Court

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition as Authorities Complied with Order to Consider Representation — No Wilful Disobedience Found Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The court held that since the respondents had initiated action and issued notices pursuant to the direction, there was no wilful disobedience of the order dated 06.02.2024 in W.P.No.2523 of 2024.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience by the respondents (Distri...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Held That the Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC Was Not Served on the Judgment Debtor and the Communication Order Was Not a Mandatory Direction, Thus No Willful Disobedience Established.

11 Feb 2026

The petitioner, A. Dakshnamoorthy, as power agent of his son D. Chandrasekaran, filed two contempt petitions. The first (Cont.P.No.1723/2025) was agai...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Holds That Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC Does Not Create a Charge on Property and That Sub Registrars Are Not Bound by Such Orders Unless Property Is Attached.

11 Feb 2026

The petitioner, D. Chandrasekaran, represented by his power agent A. Dakshnamoorthy, filed two contempt petitions. The first, Cont.P.No.1723 of 2025, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Granting 2nd ACP Benefit to Senior Supervisors. Educational Qualification for Promotional Post Not Required for ACP Scheme Under Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008.

20 Sep 2025

The case pertains to a writ petition filed by the Union of India and others challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mumbai...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Contempt Petition for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Land Allotment Order. Court Observed That Mere Disobedience Insufficient and That Possession Could Not Be Taken Due to Pending Civil Suit, Thus No Contempt Established Under Section 11, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

7 Feb 2025

This contempt petition arose from an earlier writ petition (W.P.No.28008/2017) where the High Court, by order dated 21.11.2023, directed the District ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Proceedings for Alleged Violation of Status Quo Order in Regular First Appeal. The court examined whether the accused wilfully disobeyed the status quo order dated 03.06.2013 passed in RFA No.4095/2013, invoking Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

14 Feb 2017

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, initiated suo motu contempt proceedings under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, read...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits MSRTC Officers in Disobedience Case — Dismissal Order Issued Before Receipt of Interim Protection Order. Wilful Disobedience Under Section 48(1) of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 Not Established as Order Was Passed Prior to Knowledge of Interim Direction.

21 Jun 2016

The petitioners, Madhukar Shrirang Sonwane and Dattratraya Nivruti Bhelonde, were officers of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Disobedience of Company Law Board Orders — No Prima Facie Case of Wilful Disobedience Established. The court held that contempt proceedings require clear evidence of wilful disobedience and cannot be initiated on mere allegations under Sections 10, 11, 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

29 Feb 2016

The complainant, C. Valli Narayan, filed a contempt petition under Sections 10, 11, and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging that the accu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Scope of Section 390 CrPC in Appeals Against Acquittal - Accused Not Entitled to Bail as a Matter of Right Upon Issuance of Warrant. The Full Bench overruled earlier Division Bench decisions and held that judicial discretion governs the grant of bail or committal to prison under Section 390 CrPC.

5 Oct 2012

The matter was referred to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court due to a conflict between two Division Bench decisions and the purport of Section 390...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)