Search Results for "visual and phonetic test"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Eris Lifesciences in Trademark Infringement Case. Phonetic Similarity Between 'NEBISTAR' and 'NEBISTOL' Leads to Restraint Order Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Lupin Limited, filed a suit alleging that the Defendants, Eris Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. and others, were infringing its registered tradem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Patent and Trademark Infringement Case — Finds No Prima Facie Case for Injunction. Court holds that patent for method and apparatus does not extend to product, and trademark registration is subject to opposition, thus no interim injunction warranted.

The appeal arises from an order dated 19.11.2009 in Notice of Motion No.3709 of 2009 in Suit No.2576 of 2009, whereby the trial court granted an inter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — No Deceptive Similarity Between 'Palm Grove' and 'Royal Palms' Hotels. Plaintiff's use of 'Palm Grove' always in combination with 'Ramada' and delay disentitled it to interim relief.

The Plaintiff, Palm Grove Beach Hotels Pvt. Ltd., owned and operated a mid-range hotel in Juhu, Mumbai, under the name 'Ramada Plaza Palm Grove' (prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sun Pharma's Trademark Infringement Suit Against Sanofi's METOSAN, Finding No Deceptive Similarity with METOSARTAN. The marks are phonetically and visually distinct, and the products differ in composition, negating likelihood of confusion.

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against The Madras Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Plaintiff's Conduct of Suppressing Prior User and Earlier Litigation Disentitles It to Equitable Relief Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957.

The suit was filed by ITC Limited against NTC Industries Ltd. for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off in relation to cigarettes and t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant's Infringement Suit Against Respondent Over Deceptively Similar Trade Mark. Addition of 'India' to Infringing Mark 'Rustam' Found Ineffective Under Trade Marks Act, 1940, Section 21.

The appellant, Ruston & Hornsby Ltd., a company incorporated in England, engaged in manufacturing and selling diesel internal combustion engines, was ...