Search Results for "unreasonable rejection"

525 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 525 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Teacher Seeking Approval for Appointment in Aided Minority Junior College. Court holds that rejection of approval without hearing violates natural justice and that the candidate's qualifications were equivalent.

The petitioner, Samidha Nimkar, an M.Com and B.Ed. graduate, sought appointment as a teacher for Accounting and Auditing in the 2nd respondent, KJ Som...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.

The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Prisoner's Furlough Petition — Rejection of Furlough on Unreasonable Grounds Set Aside. Court directed expeditious consideration of furlough application, holding that the ground for rejection was unreasonable and unjustifiable.

The petitioner, Rupesh Salgaonkar, a prisoner undergoing sentence of imprisonment since 22/02/2016 and in custody since his arrest on 23/01/2013, file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India renders detention order invalid.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Chirag D. Shah, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a preven...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unreasonable Delay in Considering Representation. Unexplained Delay of 25 Days in Deciding Representation Renders Detention Illegal Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Mr. Rizwan @ Tippu Sattar Pathan, challenged an order of detention dated 5th May 2014 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Pre...