Search Results for "uncorroborated"

363 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 363 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as testimony of child witness was inconsistent with medical evidence and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Tukaram Rau Jadhav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the murder of Yashodabai, and sentenced to life...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Syed Imam and Durgadas Kaushalye, a Police Sub Inspector and Police Head Constable, respect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Shankar Maruti Bamne, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the murder of Ranganath Karande under Section 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Korde, was convicted by the learned Special Judge, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 2 of 2007 for offences under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Appellants in Infanticide Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove murder beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Shantaram Raikar/Gaonkar and Shashikala Raikar/Gaonkar, were convicted by the Children's Court, Panaji, for the murder of their newbor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Stock Broking Disputes — Upholds Awards for Payment of Outstanding Dues with Interest. Claims of Bogus Trading and Unauthorized Transactions Remain Unproved Due to Lack of Evidence and Failure to Pursue Counterclaims.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed by Ms. Deepika Vijay Nihalani and Vijay Roopkumar Nihalani against INA Stock Broking Co. Pvt. Lt...