Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Knife Attack Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed Based on Credible Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. The court found that the prosecution proved the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt under Section 302 IPC for stabbing the deceased multiple times.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 59
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Rajendra @ Raju Kanadi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 240 of 2012 for the murder of his friend Manish Harishchandra Thorat under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1,000. The incident occurred on 30 November 2011 at around 3:00 p.m. when the appellant barged into the room of PW-8 Mangesh Pendse, where the deceased was present, demanded money, and after a quarrel, inflicted knife blows on the deceased's neck, chest, and buttock. The deceased ran out but was chased and stabbed again. He was admitted to K.E.M. Hospital where he died. The prosecution examined several witnesses, including eyewitnesses PW-2 Kaliya Dehede and PW-8 Mangesh Pendse, and medical evidence. The trial court convicted the appellant. The appellant appealed to the Bombay High Court challenging the conviction. The High Court examined the evidence, particularly the testimony of the eyewitnesses, and found it credible and consistent. The medical evidence corroborated the injuries. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Conviction based on eyewitness testimony - Appeal against conviction for murder by knife attack - Court examined credibility of eyewitnesses PW-2 and PW-8 and medical evidence - Held that the testimony of eyewitnesses was consistent, reliable, and corroborated by medical evidence, and the conviction was upheld (Paras 1-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Manish Thorat is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Life Imprisonment
  • Eyewitness Testimony
  • Medical Evidence
  • Credibility of Witnesses
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (11) 67

Criminal Appeal No. 342 of 2015

2022-11-14

A.S. Gadkari, Milind N. Jadhav

Mr. Manas N. Gawankar for Appellant, Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for Respondent – State

Rajendra @ Raju Kanadi

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of Manish Thorat by stabbing

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 22.07.2014 in Sessions Case No. 240 of 2012

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and witnesses were not credible Respondent argued that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through eyewitnesses and medical evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The testimony of eyewitnesses PW-2 and PW-8 was consistent, reliable, and corroborated by medical evidence, establishing the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

This Appeal questions the legality of Judgment and Order dated 22.07.2014 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.240 of 2012 convicting Appellant under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code,1860 Appellant is convicted for committing murder of his friend Manish Harishchandra Thorat (deceased) on 30.11.2011 at about 3.00 p.m. by inflicting blow with knife on his neck, chest and buttock.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted on 22.07.2014 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No. 240 of 2012. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 342 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court. The appeal was reserved on 20.09.2022 and pronounced on 14.11.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Declares Marriage Invalid Due to Absence of Requisite Ceremonies Under Section 7 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Parties Obtained Marriage Certificates Without Performing Saptapadi or Other Rites, Rendering Certificates Null and Void.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal Against Demolition Order in MMC Act Case — Failure to Issue Notice to Owner and Lack of Personal Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Tenant in Possession Since Prior to 1987 Entitled to Hearing Before Demoliti...