Search Results for "unauthorized extension"

121 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 121 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Extensions in Commercial Premises. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Sanctioned Plan or Permission for Structures on Compulsory Open Space Under Section 55 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, occupants and owners of shops in Dattani Shopping Centre, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 14 January 2011 passed by the Assistant M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appeals by Appellant Creditor in IBC Case -- Sets Aside Orders Directing Appellant to Approach GIDC Appellate Authority and Remitting Resolution Plan -- Termination of Lease During Moratorium Held Invalid Under Section 14 of IBC

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) allowed two appeals filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) and the largest financial creditor o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Case Analysis on Unauthorized Construction in Rental Property. A dispute regarding unauthorized permanent construction without landlord’s consent under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The Bombay High Court addressed a petition filed by Mrs. Binaifer Batiwala, challenging an eviction order issued by the Appellate Court. The dispute s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Housing Board Dispute — Unauthorized Construction Not Ipso Facto Nuisance but Concurrent Findings Upheld. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Despite Section 71 Bar of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 as Suit Pertains to Private Rights.

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant No.1, Sau. Smita Mohod, against concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court...