Search Results for "time limit directory"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "time limit directory"

165 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Promotion Claim Due to Non-Communication of APARs — IRCTC Promotion Policy Benchmark Quashed as Arbitrary. The court held that non-communication of Annual Performance Appraisal Reports before using them to deny promotion violates principles of natural justice, and directed reconsideration of promotion without considering uncommunicated APARs.

5 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Susheel Patil, an employee of Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd (IRCTC), filed a petition under Articles 14, 16 and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Written Statement Filing in Civil Suit — Order 8 Rule 1 CPC Held Directory Not Mandatory. The court declined to interfere under Article 227 as the trial court's order was not perverse or illegal.

8 Sep 2025

The petitioners, who were defendants in a civil suit (O.S.No.6032/2017) pending before the XXVII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, filed a writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

16 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order in Transfer Pricing Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Provide Show-Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Order Invalid. Petitioner's Objections to Draft Assessment Order Not Considered, Violating Section 144C of Income Tax Act, 1961.

28 Jul 2021

The petitioner, SHL (India) Private Limited, an Indian company and part of the SHL Group, United Kingdom, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court's Order Condoning Delay in Industrial Dispute Claim. The court held that the three-year limitation under Section 2A(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is not a bar to condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

3 Mar 2016

The petitioner, M/S ITC Infotech India Ltd., challenged an order dated 17.03.2015 passed by the III Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru, in I.D.No.6/20...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Municipal Election Dispute — Sets Aside Dismissal of Election Petition for Non-Prosecution. Restoration of Election Petition Granted as Tribunal Failed to Provide Sufficient Opportunity to Appellant Before Dismissal Under Section 21 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964.

10 Mar 2015

The present appeal was filed under Section 27 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, challenging the order dated 11.11.2013 passed by the Senior C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Dismiss Suit Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC. Order IX Rule 5 CPC does not apply when summons were never issued to defendants, and the provision is directory, allowing court discretion to extend time for service.

8 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Sanjay Madanchand Kashyap, who was defendant no.1 in Special Civil Suit No.769 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Filing of Written Statement to Counterclaim Beyond 90 Days — Condonation of Delay Granted Due to Court Vacations and Lack of Objection. Order 8 Rule 6A CPC does not prescribe a specific period for filing written statement to counterclaim; the period of 90 days under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC is directory and not mandatory.

2 Jul 2010

The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No.177/2007/A, challenged the order dated 20-8-2009 of the learned Civil Judge, Senior D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Extension of Time to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Civil Suit — Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory. Petitioner/Defendant Granted Relief as No Dilatory Tactics Were Adopted and Sufficient Cause Was Shown for Delay.

20 Oct 2006

The petitioner/defendant challenged the judgment and order dated 30th June 2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Margao, which decl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held that the Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit for Non-Prosecution Without Considering Merits and That the Suit Was Not Abated Despite Death of Sole Proprietor as Legal Representatives Were Brought on Record.

30 Nov -0001

The present appeal arises from a suit filed in 1983 by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the original defendant, Bitesh Hanumantrao...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)