Search Results for "suit tenability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "suit tenability"

181 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Remand to Appellate Court in Rent Control Eviction Case — Right of Appeal Not Violated. Partial Eviction Requirement Under Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Must Be Considered by Appellate Court.

21 Sep 2011

The appellant, Ramesh Danchand Waswani, a tenant of premises owned by respondent Yusufbhai Mukhtar Amir Varawalla, faced eviction proceedings under th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Revision and Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34. Jurisdiction of Civil Court is Ousted When Secured Creditor Takes Action Under SARFAESI Act for Enforcement of Security Interest.

11 Feb 2011

The case involves a civil suit filed by Sagar and Saurabh Deshmukh (original plaintiffs) against their father Pramod Deshmukh, mother Vrunda Deshmukh,...

High Court

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, considers landlord's writ petitions against appellate authority's rejection of eviction on bonafide need under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The dispute centers on whether the landlord established genuine requirement for the tenanted premises for family businesses and whether the appellate authority erred in overturning the Rent Controller's findings.

20 Jan 2006

The dispute before the High Court arose out of three writ petitions filed by landlord Ismalibhai Gulam Hussain challenging the orders of the Additiona...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Amendment of Notice of Motion Date; Holds Error Clerical and Permissible Under CPC Sections 153 and 151. Court found that change of date from 4th September 2016 to 2nd November 2016 in prayer clause (c) of Notice of Motion did not alter the nature of relief and was merely correction of typographical error, causing no prejudice to defendants.

17 Oct 2019

(1) Background: The dispute arises from the removal of respondent No.1, a trustee and employee of Balmohan Vidyamandir Trust, by two resolutions dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Return of Plaint for Lack of Jurisdiction in Town Planning Dispute — Court Lacks Jurisdiction Under Section 149 of MRTP Act, Need Not Decide Other Issues on Merits. Once Jurisdiction Is Found Absent, Court Becomes Functus Officio and Must Return Plaint Without Adjudicating Other Issues.

15 Dec 2006

The case arose from a suit filed by Jagdish Hari Thatte and six others against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and the State of Maharashtr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Eviction Suit — Power of Attorney Validity and Evidentiary Value of Documents Under Scrutiny. Court sets aside appellate order remanding suit for fresh trial, holding that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 29A of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 by interfering with trial court's discretion in marking documents.

28 Nov 2023

The Petitioner, Shree Raj Shrushti Residency Private Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

6 Jun 2011

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Dismissal of Review in Kulkarni Watan Land Regrant Case. Decides on Rights of Purchaser Versus Successors of Original Watandar Under Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950.

10 Jan 2019

The dispute involved lands bearing Survey Nos. 135 and 144 at Jamda, Jalgaon, originally held as Kulkarni Watan. In 1944, the vendor Ramchandra Tembul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Appellate Order in Rent Control Eviction Case — Tenant's Subletting and Change of User Not Proved. Court Restores Rent Controller's Eviction Order on Ground of Bona Fide Need for Demolition and Reconstruction Under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

31 Oct 2023

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the landlord, Hemantkumar Prabhudasji Vora, challenging the order dated 18/04/2013 passed by t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Production of Documents in Commercial Suit — Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC Does Not Mandate Filing of Documents Only at First Hearing. The court held that the trial court's discretion to allow late production of documents under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC was valid and did not cause prejudice to the defendant.

10 Jun 2025

The petitioner, M/S. JSM Corporation Private Limited, was the defendant in Commercial Original Suit No.835 of 2023 filed by the respondents, M/S. Brun...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)