Search Results for "substantially same issues"

1715 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1715 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010364002010_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments in Co-operative Housing Society. Court Holds That Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments Without General Body Approval Are Void Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, B. K. Corporation, an association of persons, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of a re-development agreement and bye-law...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeals From Order, Restores Dismissal of Civil Suits as Barred by Res Judicata. The Court Holds That Ex-Parte Decree in Earlier Suit Over Same Land Operates as Res Judicata Under Section 11 CPC Against Plaintiffs Who Were Parties to Former Suit.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the District Judge, Udgir, which had allowed the plaintiffs’ appeals against the dismissal of their suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010124482018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Recovery Due to Prior Arbitration Awards. The court held that the suit is barred by res judicata as the same claims were already adjudicated in arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

The plaintiff, Unique Integrated Transport & Management Consultancies Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and its of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...