Search Results for "subservient rights"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "subservient rights"

195 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 195 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Condonation of 586-Day Delay and Grant of Leave to Appeal to Pendente Lite Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit. The Court held that subsequent purchasers who purchased property during pendency of suit and in violation of injunction cannot claim bona fide status and have no right to appeal after their impleadment application was rejected and became final.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves appeals by the original plaintiffs (H. Anjanappa & Ors.) against an order of the Karnataka High Court condoning a delay of 586 days ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights to Tenant in Land Reforms Case. The Court held that the Land Tribunal's finding of tenancy based on evidence cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction unless perverse.

23 Dec 2021

The appellant, Sri Admar Mutt, represented by its manager, filed a writ appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restrains Subsequent Purchaser from Alienating Property During Pendency of Suit. Doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 applies to subsequent purchaser who bought property during pendency of suit for specific performance.

9 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Rehab Housing Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 16 April 2006 against the original o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Challenge to Pledge of Shares During Lock-In Period — Pledge Held Valid as Lock-In Restricts Transfer of Title, Not Interest. Court Rules That Pledge Under Section 172 of Contract Act Does Not Violate SEBI ICDR Regulations, 2009.

5 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Kannan Vishwanath, a promoter and managing director of Dr. Datson Labs Limited, filed a suit and notice of motion seeking a declaration...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Decree-Holder in Execution of Possession Decree Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Subsequent Purchasers Claiming Through Judgment Debtor Cannot Claim Better Right to Obstruct Decree Under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC.

30 Sep 2021

The writ petition arose from execution proceedings concerning a decree for possession of agricultural land. The original plaintiff, Smt. Anjanabai Tat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Regular First Appeal Challenging Decree Holding Sale Deeds Void Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act in Pending Partition Suit. Appeal contests application of lis pendens doctrine to nullify purchases made during pendency of suit, with court's analysis focusing on extent of co-heir rights in Mohammedan law.

31 Jan 2015

The case arose from a partition suit filed by two Muslim women, Smt. Jameela Begum and Smt. Iqbal Begum, seeking their shares in the properties left b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleading Application in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioner Entitled to be Heard Before Compromise Decree Affecting Her Rights. The court held that a person whose rights are directly affected by a compromise decree in a subsequent suit is a necessary and proper party under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, and the trial court erred in rejecting the impleading application.

26 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Narayanamma, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (OS 2289/2007) against respondents 1 to 3 based on an agreement to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Removal of Managing Committee Members of Cooperative Society Without Show Cause Notice. The Court held that the power under Section 77(1) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 to remove a committee can be exercised only after giving an opportunity of being heard, and the order of removal passed without such opportunity is illegal and unsustainable.

17 Nov 2014

The petitioners, eight members of the Managing Committee of the Ordnance Factory Bhandara Karmachari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit (respondent No.4-So...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Assignee Bank Can Invoke SARFAESI Act for Debt Assigned by NBFC. The case involves interpretation of 'debt' and 'secured creditor' under SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDDBFI Act, 1993, and the effect of assignment from a non-banking financial company to a bank.

16 Jul 2015

The petitioner, a banking company, sought to enforce security interest under the SARFAESI Act after acquiring a debt and underlying security from a no...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)