KAHC010006872022_1
6 Jun 2022The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C.No.261...
Search Results for "statutory sanction"
2474 result(s) found
Found 2474 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order Against Public Servants in Private Complaint for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 PC Act. Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servants is Mandatory for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duty.
2 Jan 2017The case involves two criminal revision petitions filed by the petitioners (accused No.2, 3 and 4) challenging the order dated 13.4.2012 passed by the...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.
1 Jan 1970The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...
- 38
High Court
Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Special Judge's Order Dismissing Private Corruption Complaint Due to Erroneous Sanction Requirement. Court Holds That Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act Does Not Bar Pre-Cognizance Investigation Order Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., and Complaint Against Non-Public Servants Cannot be Dismissed Solely for Lack of Sanction Against Public Servants.
7 Sep 2022The petitioner, a private complainant, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, assailing the order dated ...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Private School Employees in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction by Director of Education for prosecution under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 held invalid as the appointing authority is the school management under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.
11 Sep 2019The petitioners, employees of a private school (Headmaster, teacher, and clerk), were chargesheeted for offences under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d), and 1...
- 84
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Taking Cognizance Against Additional Advocate General in Private Complaint for Offences Under SC/ST Act and IPC — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 of PC Act
26 Jun 2013The petitioner, Sri K M Nataraj, the Additional Advocate General of Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside Discharge for IPC Offences Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC, Upholds Corruption Charges Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Deputation of Public Servant to Municipal Corporation Renders Section 197 CrPC Inapplicable as He Ceases to Be Removable by Government, and Amended Section 19 of PC Act Does Not Apply Retrospectively to Retired Official.
22 Apr 2025The Supreme Court heard two appeals by special leave against a common judgment and order dated 29 January 2024 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana...
- 476
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Invalid Sanction — Prior Sanction Under Section 20A(2) TADA Must Show Application of Mind. The Designated Court's finding of non-application of mind in sanction order was upheld, and the prosecution could not proceed under TADA.
27 Feb 2019The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of three respondents by the Designated Judge, Jamnagar, in Special TADA Case Nos.3/1994, 3/1997, a...
- 223
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Construction Dispute — No Sanction Order Existed, No Estoppel Against Corporation. Plaintiffs failed to prove deemed sanction under Section 264 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 as no formal order was passed and no notice of revocation was issued.
3 Mar 2010The appellants, original plaintiffs, owned plot nos. 71/72, 70/2 and 70/3 on Sheet No. 67-D at Amravati. They filed Regular Civil Suit No. 193 of 1988...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Sanction of Disputed Development Control Regulations in PIL Challenging Unauthorized Insertion by Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation. Unauthorized Insertion of Regulations 16.4.12 and 16.4.13 Without General Body Approval Violates Section 37 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and Vitiates State Government's Approval.
9 Sep 2014The case originated from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur challenging the legality of the insertion of two regulatio...
- 38
