Search Results for "state seniority list"

742 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 742 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Uttar Pradesh Reservation in Promotion Rules Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of Constitution. Conflicting High Court Decisions on Requirement of Quantifiable Data for Backwardness and Inadequacy of Representation Lead to Appeals.

The case originated from a batch of civil appeals preferred by the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging conflicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Judicial Officers Challenging High Court Order Quashing Gradation List Based on Roster Points. Seniority for Promotion of Munsiffs Must Be Based on Merit, Not Reservation Roster, as Per Bimlesh Tanwar.

The case involves a dispute over the fixation of seniority of Munsiffs (Batch of 2003) for promotion to the post of Sub-Judge in the State of Jammu & ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Service Law Seniority Dispute Based on Select Panel Merit. Seniority of Direct Recruits Determined by Order of Merit in Select Panel Under DoPT OM Dated 3 July 1986, Not Date of Joining, as 1971 Rules Were Silent on Inter-Se Seniority for Combined All India List.

The dispute arose from the Military Engineering Service, where candidates were selected in 1983 for Superintendent posts across five Commands but some...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruit District Judge's Claim for Seniority Over Promotees in Kerala Higher Judicial Service. Notional Seniority Granted from Date of Initial Appointment of Other Direct Recruits in Same Selection.

The case involves a dispute over seniority between direct recruit District Judges and promotees appointed by transfer in the Kerala Higher Judicial Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Transfer Rules for Teachers in Challenge Under Articles 226 and 227. Rules 5 and 19(2) of the Karnataka State Civil Services (Regulation of Transfer of Teachers) Rules, 2017 held valid and intra vires the parent Act and the Right to Education Act, 2009.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ombudsman Report in Seniority Dispute — Seniority Determined by Date of Joining, Not Date of Recommendation by Public Service Commission.

The petitioners, including Maya M. Pednekar and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the report dated 16.02.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seniority List and Promotion Order in KIMS — Seniority Based on Date of Joining Upheld Over Merit Ranking. The court held that the petitioner, despite higher merit, cannot claim seniority over a colleague who joined earlier.

The petitioner, Dr. Aadamali Nadaf, an Assistant Professor at Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Hubli, filed a writ petition under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Seniority Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Police (Civil) Subordinate Service Rules. Inter se Seniority of Sub-Inspectors to be Fixed on Completion of Training as per Rule 15.

The appeals before the Supreme Court arose out of a dispute regarding seniority in the cadre of Sub-Inspectors of Police in the State of Andhra Prades...