Search Results for "single scheme"

4299 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4299 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Writ Petition Against Tribunal Order Denying MACP Benefits to Junior Engineers. Clause 2(b)(3) of GR 2010 and Prior Upgradation Under GR 1984 Are Central to Dispute Over Second Benefit Entitlement.

The petitioners, an association of subordinate service engineers and its members, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dism...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in MACP Scheme Financial Upgradation Dispute. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Entitles Employees to Next Higher Grade Pay, Not Grade Pay of Next Promotional Post.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against orders of various High Courts and Central Administrative Tribunals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Grant of Scheme to Another Developer. Court upholds SRA's decision based on eligibility criteria and policy, finding no arbitrariness or violation of principles of natural justice.

The Petitioners, Dyna Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a developer) and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (a proposed cooperative society of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Examines Fee Reimbursement Scheme Restriction for Minority Institution Students. Court Tasked with Resolving Conflicting Precedents on Whether Limiting Reimbursement to CAP-Admitted Students Is Discriminatory.

The case concerned a challenge to a Government Resolution (GR) dated 27.02.2013 issued by the State of Maharashtra, which restricted fee reimbursement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Stamp Duty Assessment on NCLT Order Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 -- Petitioner Challenges Rs. 50,00,000 Duty on Amalgamation Scheme Instrument

The High Court heard a writ petition by Petitioner. challenging stamp duty assessment of Rs. 50,00,000 on an NCLT Mumbai order sanctioning a composite...