Search Results for "shares recovery"

670 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 670 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Objections to Maintainability and Limitation in Suit for Recovery of Trust Property. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Suit for Recovery of Shares by Public Charitable Trusts Not Barred by Limitation.

The case concerned a notice of motion taken out by two public charitable trusts, the J.V. Gokal Charity Trust and Shree Krishna Foundation, against Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Petition. Company Appeal No.19 of 2009 Challenges CLB's Findings on Reduction of Shareholding, Removal of Director, and Valuation of Land Under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The case involved a dispute between shareholders of Pantheon Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a company formed to acquire and develop a 13-acre property in M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Challenge to Pledge of Shares During Lock-In Period — Pledge Held Valid as Lock-In Restricts Transfer of Title, Not Interest. Court Rules That Pledge Under Section 172 of Contract Act Does Not Violate SEBI ICDR Regulations, 2009.

The plaintiff, Kannan Vishwanath, a promoter and managing director of Dr. Datson Labs Limited, filed a suit and notice of motion seeking a declaration...