Search Results for "selection seniority"

664 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 664 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Seniority in CGHS Promotion Dispute. Seniority Determined by Date of Regular Appointment, Not Ad Hoc Promotion, Under Central Civil Services Rules.

The petitioner, Arjun Sopan Gaikwad, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 16 October 1978 and promoted to Upper Division Clerk on 9 April 1984. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Direct Recruits' Appeal in Seniority Dispute — Date of Appointment Prevails Over Year of Vacancy. Promotees appointed on 01.03.2007 are senior to direct recruits appointed on 14.08.2007 and 24.11.2007 under the Manipur Police Service Rules, 1965.

The case involves an inter-se seniority dispute between promotees and direct recruits in the Manipur Police Service Grade II Officers Cadre. The promo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Seniority Determination in Assistant Teacher Cadre — Continuous Service Length Decides Seniority Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules, 1981. Education Officer's Order Upheld as Respondent No.4 Appointed Earlier, Hence Senior.

The petitioner, Salim Gulab Mulla, and respondent no.4, Sunil Ananta Devkule, were both assistant teachers at New English School, Mandhardeo, run by r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Tags Civil Appeals and Transfer Cases on Inter Se Seniority Between Direct Recruit and Promotees in Income Tax Department. Core Question is Whether Seniority of Direct Recruits Should be Based on Date of Appointment or Date of Vacancy.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals and transfer cases concerning the inter se seniority dispute between direct recruits and pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Seniority List of Section Supervisors in EPFO. Seniority Determined by Date of Promotion, Not by Date of Eligibility, Upheld by CAT.

The petitioners, Smt. L.M. Mahadik and Shri S.D. Jagtap, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Resolution on Seniority of District Judges Promoted Through Limited Competitive Examination. Merit-Based Seniority Upheld as Administrative Committee's Decision Contravened Supreme Court Directives and Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services Rules, 1994.

The dispute concerned District Judges in Madhya Pradesh who were appointed to the Higher Judicial Services through Limited Competitive Examinations (L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Seniority List of Graduate High School Teachers — Directs Inclusion of Petitioner with Continuous Service from 1988. Sahitya Sudhakar Qualification Treated as Equivalent to Graduation for Seniority Purposes Under Zilla Parishad Service Rules.

The petitioner, Shri Jaiprakash Baburao Gaidhane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the final seniority li...