Search Results for "seized gold"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs FRRO to Issue Exit Permit to Acquitted Chinese National in Gold Smuggling Case — Customs Department's Opposition Held Unjustified. The court held that the mere intention to challenge an acquittal does not justify preventing an acquitted person from leaving the country.

The petitioner, a Chinese national, arrived in India on a flight from Beijing that was diverted to Mumbai due to bad weather. Upon arrival, customs of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Customs and FERA Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Acquittal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Possession of Smuggled Currency Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 135(1)(a)(i) and 135(1)(b)(i) of Customs Act, 1962.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Amalio Simoes, by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 3rd Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears appeal against CESTAT order upholding duty demand and confiscation of diamonds due to shortage and non-compliance with export obligations — substantial questions raised on interpretation of Notification No. 177/94-Cus and para 8.78B of Handbook of Procedures.

The appellant, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold jewellery studded with diamonds at its unit in the Santacruz Electronics...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Courier License in Gold Smuggling Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Suspension Order Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Allege Any Act or Omission by Petitioner Under Courier Regulations, 1998.

The petitioner, TNT India Private Limited, a private limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and a subsidiary of TNT Expres...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Supply of Incriminating Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Statements of Co-Accused and Call Data Records Not Furnished.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vilas Vithal Ambokar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 10th April 2015 passed by the Principal Secreta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No. 3 for Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Gold Bars in Bank Fraud Case. Court holds that possession of stolen property soon after theft, coupled with lack of explanation, is sufficient for conviction under Section 411 IPC.

The case pertains to a large-scale bank fraud involving forged Telegraphic Transfers (TTs) amounting to Rs. 6,70,00,000/- at Vijaya Bank, Nasik Branch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case for Non-Application of Mind. Detenu in judicial custody; detaining authority failed to consider less restrictive alternatives under ordinary law, rendering detention order invalid.

The petitioner, Mahesh V. Amesur, cousin of Jeetu Shankarlal Chhapru, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging ...